<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Parasites &amp; Vectors - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Parasites &amp; Vectors</description>
        <dc:date>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/81" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/80" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/79" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/78" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/77" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/76" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/75" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/74" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/73" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/72" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/81">
        <title>New protective battle-dress impregnated against mosquito vector bites</title>
        <description>Background:
Mixing repellent and organophosphate (OP) insecticides to better control pyrethroid resistant mosquito vectors is a promising strategy developed for bed net impregnation. Here, we investigated the opportunity to adapt this strategy to personal protection in the form of impregnated clothes.
Methods:
We compared standard permethrin impregnated uniforms with uniforms manually impregnated with the repellent KBR3023 alone and in combination with an organophosphate, Pyrimiphos-Methyl (PM). Tests were carried out with Aedes aegypti, the dengue fever vector, at dusk in experimental huts.
Results:
Results showed that the personal protection provided by repellent KBR3023-impregnated uniforms is equal to permethrin treated uniforms and that KBR/PM impregnated uniforms are more protective.
Conclusion:
The use of repellents alone or combined with OP on clothes could be promising for personal protection of military troops and travellers if residual activity of the repellents is extended and safety is verified.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/81</link>
                <dc:creator>Cedric Pennetier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Chabi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thibaud Martin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fabrice Chandre</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christophe Rogier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean-Marc Hougard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frederic Pages</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:81</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-81</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/80">
        <title>Anopheline and culicine mosquitoes are not repelled by surfaces treated with the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana
</title>
        <description>Background:
Entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana, are promising bio-pesticides for application against adult malaria mosquito vectors. An understanding of the behavioural responses of mosquitoes towards these fungi is necessary to guide development of fungi beyond the &apos;proof of concept&apos; stage and to design suitable intervention tools.
Methods:
Here we tested whether oil-formulations of the two fungi could be detected and avoided by adult Anopheles gambiae s.s., Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus. The bioassays used a glass chamber divided into three compartments (each 250 x 250 x 250 mm): release, middle and stimulus compartments. Netting with or without fungus was fitted in front of the stimulus compartment. Mosquitoes were released and the proportion that entered the stimulus compartment was determined and compared between treatments. Treatments were untreated netting (control 1), netting with mineral oil (control 2) and fungal conidia formulated in mineral oil evaluated at three different dosages (2x1010, 4x1010 and 8x1010 conidia m-2).
Results:
Neither fungal strain was repellent as the mean proportion of mosquitoes collected in the stimulus compartment did not differ between experiments with surfaces treated with and without fungus regardless of the fungal isolate and mosquito species tested.
Conclusion:
Our results indicate that mineral-oil formulations of M. anisopliae and B. bassiana were not repellent against the mosquito species tested. Therefore, both fungi are suitable candidates for the further development of tools that aim to control host-seeking or resting mosquitoes using entomopathogenic fungi.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/80</link>
                <dc:creator>Ladslaus Mnyone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Constantianus Koenraadt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Issa Lyimo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Mpingwa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Willem Takken</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tanya Russell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:80</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-80</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/79">
        <title>The essential oil of Brazilian pepper, Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi in larval control of Stegomyia aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762)</title>
        <description>Background:
The ability of mosquitoes of the genus Aedes and its allies, such as Stegomyia, to transmit diseases such as dengue and yellow fever, makes them important in public health. This study aims to evaluate the use of the essential oil of Brazilian pepper in biological control of by assessing and quantifying the larvicidal effect against S. aegypti, the only available access to dengue control, and test its risk of genotoxicity with Salmonella typhimurium as an indicator of safety for its environmental use.
Results:
The density of the oil was 0.8622 g mL-1. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry revealed six major constituents: delta-3-carene (55.43%), alpha-pinene (16.25%), sylvestrene (10.67%), germacrene D (2.17), beta-myrcene (1.99%), and isoterpinolene (1.4%). The minimum inhibitory dose to larvae development was 862.20 ug mL-1. The median lethal dose (LD50) of the essential oil for larvae was between the concentrations of 172.44-344.88 ug mL-1. There was no mutagenic risk for the essential oil, since there were no biochemical or morphological changes in S. typhimurium after exposure to the essential oil.
Conclusions:
The minimum inhibitory essential oil concentration and the median lethal dose pointed to the value of the use of water dispersions of Brazilian pepper essential oil as an environmental safe natural larvicidal for S. aegypti.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/79</link>
                <dc:creator>Ary Silva</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Drielle Almeida</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silas Ronchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amarildo Bento</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rodrigo Scherer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alessandro Ramos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zilma Cruz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:79</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-79</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/78">
        <title>Retraction: Trapping mosquitoes using milk products as odour baits in western Kenya</title>
        <description>This article, Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:55, has been retracted by the Editor because there are unresolved issues relating to authorship and content.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/78</link>
                <dc:creator>Eunice Owino</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:78</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-78</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/77">
        <title>Occurrence and genetic variability of Phlebotomus papatasi in an urban area of southern Italy</title>
        <description>Background:
A phlebotomine sand fly was noticed in the second floor of an old building in a highly urbanized area of southern Italy. A short-term entomological survey was carried out in the subsequent weeks to this event, allowing the collection of additional phlebotomine sand flies that were later identified as Phlebotomus papatasi. We assessed the genetic variability among P. papatasi sequences obtained in this study and those available from Italy using a mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragment (from cytochrome b gene to NADH1) and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) as genetic markers.
Results:
From 9 June to 19 July, eight males and seven females (two blood-fed) of P. papatasi were collected in the old town of Bari (southern Italy). The insects were found near the bed and in the bathroom and potential blood sources (e.g., pigeons and dogs) for them were common in the neighbourhood. Again, five females of P. papatasi collected in Valenzano, another urban area in the province of Bari, were also identified and included in the genetic study. The mtDNA sequences (945 bp) obtained from Bari and Valenzano were identical except for a single transition (T&lt;-&gt;C) at the 793 nucleotide residue. Pairwise comparison of the last 440 bp of the mtDNA fragment analyzed herein with other sequences of P. papatasi from Italy revealed a nucleotide variation ranging from 0.2 to 1.3%. Three ITS2 sequence types were detected within specimens collected in Valenzano, one of them identical to that from Bari. Pairwise comparison of ITS2 sequences of P. papatasi from Italy revealed a nucleotide variation up to 1.8%.
Conclusions:
This study reports the occurrence of P. papatasi in an urban area of southern Italy and shows a low nucleotide difference among ITS2 and mtDNA sequences of this species available from Italy. The presence of P. papatasi in urban areas might represent a risk for human health, particularly for the potential transmission of sandfly fever viruses.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/77</link>
                <dc:creator>Filipe Dantas-Torres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Stefania Latrofa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Domenico Otranto</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:77</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-77</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/76">
        <title>PCR amplification of Bartonella koehlerae from human blood and enrichment blood cultures</title>
        <description>Background:
Cats appear to be the primary reservoir host for Bartonella koehlerae, an alpha Proteobacteria that is most likely transmitted among cat populations by fleas (Ctenocephalides felis). Bartonella koehlerae has caused endocarditis in a dog and in one human patient from Israel, but other clinically relevant reports involving this bacterium are lacking. Despite publication of numerous, worldwide epidemiological studies designed to determine the prevalence of Bartonella spp. bacteremia in cats, B. koehlerae has never been isolated using conventional blood agar plates. To date, successful isolation of B. koehlerae from cats and from the one human endocarditis patient has consistently required the use of chocolate agar plates.
Results:
In this study, Bartonella koehlerae bacteremia was documented in eight immunocompetent patients by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing, either prior to or after enrichment blood culture using Bartonella alpha Proteobacteria growth medium. Presenting symptoms most often included fatigue, insomnia, joint pain, headache, memory loss, and muscle pain. Four patients were also infected with Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotype II. After molecular documentation of B. koehlerae infection in these patients, a serological test was developed and serum samples were tested retrospectively. Bartonella koehlerae antibodies were not detected (titers&lt; 1:16) in 30 healthy human control sera, whereas five of eight patient samples had B. koehlerae antibody titers of 1:64 or greater.
Conclusions:
Although biased by a study population consisting of individuals with extensive arthropod and animal exposure, the results of this study suggest that B. koehlerae bacteremia is more common in immunocompetent people than has been previously suspected. Future studies should more thoroughly define modes of transmission and risk factors for acquiring infection with B. koehlerae. In addition, studies are needed to determine if B. koehlerae is a cause or cofactor in the development of arthritis, peripheral neuropathies or tachyarrhythmias in patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/76</link>
                <dc:creator>Edward Breitschwerdt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ricardo Maggi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>B Robert Mozayeni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Hegarty</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julie Bradley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Mascarelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:76</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-76</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/75">
        <title>Optimization of odour-baited resting boxes for sampling malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis Patton, in arid and highland areas of Africa  </title>
        <description>Background:
Odour baited resting boxes are simple, reliable and important tools for sampling malaria vector mosquitoes in surveillance and control programmes in different parts of Africa. To optimize the use of cow urine baited resting boxes for sampling An. arabiensis, a community-based study was conducted in Mabogini hamlet in the Lower Moshi irrigation scheme area.MethodExperimental designs using 3 by 3 Latin square were conducted for twenty days to evaluate the following: i) the effect of different parameters in the sampling of mosquitoes using odour baited resting boxes; ii) the performance of odour baited traps under indoor and outdoor conditions and the effect of people sleeping indoors on mosquito density; iii) the effect of position in the placement of traps on collection of mosquitoes; and, iv) the efficiency of the trap outdoors at three different distances from the house wall. One extra house served as the sentinel house to monitor species abundance using a CDC-miniature light trap.
Results:
8581 mosquitoes were sampled by odour baited resting boxes of which, 8051 (93.82%) were An. arabiensis and 530 (6.18%) Cx. quinquefasciatus. The light trap collected 12,420 mosquitoes, of which 9442 (76.02%) were An. arabiensis, 126 (1.01%) An. funestus group, 230 (1.85%) An. rufipes and 2622 (21.11%) Cx. quinquefasciatus. The best height for outdoor mosquitoes sampling was 15 cm and 220 cm while indoors was 105 cm. The difference in mosquito collection between different outdoor and indoor heights was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.0001). The optimal outdoor location of odour baited resting boxes from the wall of the house was 3 m.
Conclusions:
The results of these studies demonstrate an optimal method for sampling during surveillance and control programmes in rural villages of highlands and arid areas of Africa using inexpensive baits and boxes.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/75</link>
                <dc:creator>Eliningaya Kweka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Beda Mwang'onde</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aneth Mahande</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:75</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-75</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/74">
        <title>Major effect genes or loose confederations? The development of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae</title>
        <description>Insecticide use in public health and agriculture presents a dramatic adaptive challenge to target and non-target insect populations. The rapid development of genetically modulated resistance to insecticides is postulated to develop in two distinct ways: By selection for single major effect genes or by selection for loose confederations in which several factors, not normally associated with each other, inadvertently combine their effects to produce resistance phenotypes. Insecticide resistance is a common occurrence and has been intensively studied in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae, providing a useful model for examining how insecticide resistance develops and what pleiotropic effects are likely to emerge as a consequence of resistance. As malaria vector control becomes increasingly reliant on successfully managing insecticide resistance, the characterisation of resistance mechanisms and their pleiotropic effects becomes increasingly important.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/74</link>
                <dc:creator>Basil Brooke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lizette Koekemoer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:74</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-74</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/73">
        <title>Gene-knockdown in the honey bee mite Varroa destructor by a non-invasive approach: studies on a glutathione S-transferase</title>
        <description>Background:
The parasitic mite Varroa destructor is considered the major pest of the European honey bee (Apis mellifera) and responsible for declines in honey bee populations worldwide. Exploiting the full potential of gene sequences becoming available for V. destructor requires adaptation of modern molecular biology approaches to this non-model organism. Using a mu-class glutathione S-transferase (VdGST-mu1) as a candidate gene we investigated the feasibility of gene knockdown in V. destructor by double-stranded RNA-interference (dsRNAi).
Results:
Intra-haemocoelic injection of dsRNA-VdGST-mu1 resulted in 97% reduction in VdGST-mu1 transcript levels 48 h post-injection compared to mites injected with a bolus of irrelevant dsRNA (LacZ). This gene suppression was maintained to, at least, 72 h. Total GST catalytic activity was reduced by 54% in VdGST-mu1 gene knockdown mites demonstrating the knockdown was effective at the translation step as well as the transcription steps. Although near total gene knockdown was achieved by intra-haemocoelic injection, only half of such treated mites survived this traumatic method of dsRNA administration and less invasive methods were assessed. V. destructor immersed overnight in 0.9% NaCl solution containing dsRNA exhibited excellent reduction in VdGST-mu1 transcript levels (87% compared to mites immersed in dsRNA-LacZ). Importantly, mites undergoing the immersion approach had greatly improved survival (75-80%) over 72 h, approaching that of mites not undergoing any treatment.
Conclusions:
Our findings on V. destructor are the first report of gene knockdown in any mite species and demonstrate that the small size of such organisms is not a major impediment to applying gene knockdown approaches to the study of such parasitic pests. The immersion in dsRNA solution method provides an easy, inexpensive, relatively high throughput method of gene silencing suitable for studies in V. destructor, other small mites and immature stages of ticks.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/73</link>
                <dc:creator>Ewan Campbell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giles Budge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Bowman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:73</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-73</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/72">
        <title>The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Americas: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic precis</title>
        <description>Background:
An increasing knowledge of the global risk of malaria shows that the nations of the Americas have the lowest levels of Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax endemicity worldwide, sustained, in part, by substantive integrated vector control. To help maintain and better target these efforts, knowledge of the contemporary distribution of each of the dominant vector species (DVS) of human malaria is needed, alongside a comprehensive understanding of the ecology and behaviour of each species.
Results:
A database of contemporary occurrence data for 41 of the DVS of human malaria was compiled from intensive searches of the formal and informal literature. The results for the nine DVS of the Americas are described in detail here. Nearly 6000 occurrence records were gathered from 25 countries in the region and were complemented by a synthesis of published expert opinion range maps, refined further by a technical advisory group of medical entomologists. A suite of environmental and climate variables of suspected relevance to anopheline ecology were also compiled from open access sources. These three sets of data were then combined to produce predictive species range maps using the Boosted Regression Tree method. The predicted geographic extent for each of the following species (or species complex*) are provided: Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albimanus Wiedemann, 1820, An. (Nys.) albitarsis*, An. (Nys.) aquasalis Curry, 1932, An. (Nys.) darlingi Root, 1926, An. (Anopheles) freeborni Aitken, 1939, An. (Nys.) marajoara Galvao &amp; Damasceno, 1942, An. (Nys.) nuneztovari*, An. (Ano.) pseudopunctipennis* and An. (Ano.) quadrimaculatus Say, 1824. A bionomics review summarising ecology and behaviour relevant to the control of each of these species was also compiled.
Conclusions:
The distribution maps and bionomics review should both be considered as a starting point in an ongoing process of (i) describing the distributions of these DVS (since the opportunistic sample of occurrence data assembled can be substantially improved) and (ii) documenting their contemporary bionomics (since intervention and control pressures can act to modify behavioural traits). This is the first in a series of three articles describing the distribution of the 41 global DVS worldwide. The remaining two publications will describe those vectors found in (i) Africa, Europe and the Middle East and (ii) in Asia. All geographic distribution maps are being made available in the public domain according to the open access principles of the Malaria Atlas Project.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/72</link>
                <dc:creator>Marianne Sinka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yasmin Rubio-Palis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sylvie Manguin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anand Patil</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Will Temperley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Gething</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Van Boeckel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Caroline Kabaria</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ralph Harbach</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Hay</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, 3:72</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-72</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
