<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Parasites &amp; Vectors - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Parasites &amp; Vectors</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/69" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/4/1/41" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/78" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/1/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/67" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/86" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/77" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/79" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/4/1/72" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/69">
        <title>A global map of dominant malaria vectors</title>
        <description>Background:
Global maps, in particular those based on vector distributions, have long been used to help visualise the global extent of malaria. Few, however, have been created with the support of a comprehensive and extensive evidence-based approach.
Methods:
Here we describe the generation of a global map of the dominant vector species (DVS) of malaria that makes use of predicted distribution maps for individual species or species complexes.
Results:
Our global map highlights the spatial variability in the complexity of the vector situation. In Africa, An. gambiae, An. arabiensis and An. funestus are co-dominant across much of the continent, whereas in the Asian-Pacific region there is a highly complex situation with multi-species coexistence and variable species dominance.
Conclusions:
The competence of the mapping methodology to accurately portray DVS distributions is discussed. The comprehensive and contemporary database of species-specific spatial occurrence (currently available on request) will be made directly available via the Malaria Atlas Project (MAP) website from early 2012.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/69</link>
                <dc:creator>Marianne Sinka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Bangs</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sylvie Manguin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yasmin Rubio-Palis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maureen Coetzee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Mbogo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Janet Hemmingway</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anand Patil</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Temperley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Gething</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Caroline Kabaria</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Burkot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ralph Harbach</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Hay</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2012, null:69</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-69</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>We describe the generation of a global map of the dominant vector species (DVS) of malaria created by combining evidence-based predicted distribution maps for individual species or species complexes.  Image: The distribution of dominant malaria vectors in Africa.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-5-69-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/5">
        <title>History of the discovery of the malaria parasites and their vectors</title>
        <description>Malaria is caused by infection with protozoan parasites belonging to the genus Plasmodium transmitted by female Anopheles species mosquitoes. Our understanding of the malaria parasites begins in 1880 with the discovery of the parasites in the blood of malaria patients by Alphonse Laveran. The sexual stages in the blood were discovered by William MacCallum in birds infected with a related haematozoan, Haemoproteus columbae, in 1897 and the whole of the transmission cycle in culicine mosquitoes and birds infected with Plasmodium relictum was elucidated by Ronald Ross in 1897. In 1898 the Italian malariologists, Giovanni Battista Grassi, Amico Bignami, Giuseppe Bastianelli, Angelo Celli, Camillo Golgi and Ettore Marchiafava demonstrated conclusively that human malaria was also transmitted by mosquitoes, in this case anophelines. The discovery that malaria parasites developed in the liver before entering the blood stream was made by Henry Shortt and Cyril Garnham in 1948 and the final stage in the life cycle, the presence of dormant stages in the liver, was conclusively demonstrated in 1982 by Wojciech Krotoski. This article traces the main events and stresses the importance of comparative studies in that, apart from the initial discovery of parasites in the blood, every subsequent discovery has been based on studies on non-human malaria parasites and related organisms.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/3/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Francis Cox</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2010, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-5</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>History of the discovery of the malaria parasites</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>The story of the history of the malaria parasites and their mosquito vectors is traced from the first discovery of the parasites in 1880 to the present time. Image: Ronald Ross who discovered that malaria parasites were transmitted by mosquitoes.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-3-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/4/1/41">
        <title>Zoonotic helminths affecting the human eye</title>
        <description>Nowaday, zoonoses are an important cause of human parasitic diseases worldwide and a major threat to the socio-economic development, mainly in developing countries. Importantly, zoonotic helminths that affect human eyes (HIE) may cause blindness with severe socio-economic consequences to human communities. These infections include nematodes, cestodes and trematodes, which may be transmitted by vectors (dirofilariasis, onchocerciasis, thelaziasis), food consumption (sparganosis, trichinellosis) and those acquired indirectly from the environment (ascariasis, echinococcosis, fascioliasis). Adult and/or larval stages of HIE may localize into human ocular tissues externally (i.e., lachrymal glands, eyelids, conjunctival sacs) or into the ocular globe (i.e., intravitreous retina, anterior and or posterior chamber) causing symptoms due to the parasitic localization in the eyes or to the immune reaction they elicit in the host. Unfortunately, data on HIE are scant and mostly limited to case reports from different countries. The biology and epidemiology of the most frequently reported HIE are discussed as well as clinical description of the diseases, diagnostic considerations and video clips on their presentation and surgical treatment.Homines amplius oculis, quam auribus creduntSeneca Ep 6,5Men believe their eyes more than their ears</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/4/1/41</link>
                <dc:creator>Domenico Otranto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Eberhard</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2011, null:41</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-4-41</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>Zoonotic helminths that affect human eyes may cause blindness with severe socio-economic consequences to human communities. Their biology and epidemiology are discussed as well as clinical descriptions of the diseases, and video clips on their presentation. Image: Coenurus cyst with multiple protoscoleces behind displaced retina. (modified from Orihel and Ash, ASCP Press, 1995).
</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-4-41-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-03-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/78">
        <title>Insecticide resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus from Zanzibar: implications for vector control programmes

</title>
        <description>Background:
Zanzibar has a long history of lymphatic filariasis (LF) caused by the filarial parasite Wuchereria bancrofti, and transmitted by the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say. The LF Programme in Zanzibar has successfully implemented mass drug administration (MDA) to interrupt transmission, and is now in the elimination phase. Monitoring infections in mosquitoes, and assessing the potential role of interventions such as vector control, is important in case the disease re-emerges as a public health problem. Here, we examine Culex mosquito species from the two main islands to detect W. bancrofti infection and to determine levels of susceptibility to the insecticides used for vector control.
Methods:
Culex mosquitoes collected during routine catches in Vitongoji, Pemba Island, and Makadara, Unguja Island were tested for W. bancrofti infection using PCR. Insecticide bioassays on Culex mosquitoes were performed to determine susceptibility to permethrin, deltamethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, DDT and bendiocarb. Additional synergism assays with piperonyl butoxide (PBO) were used for lambda-cyhalothrin. Pyrosequencing was used to determine the kdr genotype and sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) subunit performed to identify ambiguous Culex species.
Results:
None of the wild-caught Culex mosquitoes analysed were found to be positive for W. bancrofti. High frequencies of resistance to all insecticides were found in Wete, Pemba Island, whereas Culex from the nearby site of Tibirinzi (Pemba) and in Kilimani, Unguja Island remained relatively susceptible. Species identification confirmed that mosquitoes from Wete were Culex quinquefasciatus. The majority of the Culex collected from Tibirinzi and all from Kilimani could not be identified to species by molecular assays. Two alternative kdr alleles, both resulting in a L1014F substitution were detected in Cx. quinquefasciatus from Wete with no homozygote susceptible detected. Metabolic resistance to pyrethroids was also implicated by PBO synergism assays.
Conclusions:
Results from the xenomonitoring are encouraging for the LF programme in Zanzibar. However, the high levels of pyrethroid resistance found in the principle LF vector in Pemba Island will need to be taken into consideration if vector control is to be implemented as part of the elimination programme.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/78</link>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Jones</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Camille Machin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Khalfan Mohammed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silas Majambere</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abdullah Ali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bakari Khatib</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juma Mcha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hilary Ranson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Louise Kelly-Hope</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2012, null:78</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-78</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>The study examined Culex species from Zanzibar to detect Wuchereria bancrofti infection and to determine levels of susceptibility to insecticides. The results have implications for vector control programmes on Zanzibar. Image: Mosquito larval storage, Pemba Island.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-5-78-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/1/1/3">
        <title>The history of African trypanosomiasis</title>
        <description>The prehistory of African trypanosomiasis indicates that the disease may have been an important selective factor in the evolution of hominids. Ancient history and medieval history reveal that African trypanosomiasis affected the lives of people living in sub-Saharan African at all times. Modern history of African trypanosomiasis revolves around the identification of the causative agents and the mode of transmission of the infection, and the development of drugs for treatment and methods for control of the disease. From the recent history of sleeping sickness we can learn that the disease can be controlled but probably not be eradicated. Current history of human African trypanosomiasis has shown that the production of anti-sleeping sickness drugs is not always guaranteed, and therefore, new, better and cheaper drugs are urgently required.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/1/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Dietmar Steverding</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2008, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-02-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-1-3</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>History of African trypanosomiasis</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>This review article summarises the history of African trypanosomiasis from prehistory to current developments.  From this history we learn which factors determine, and which measures control, the emergence and the spread of the disease.

Image: Sir David Bruce (1855-1931).  </dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-1-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-02-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/67">
        <title>First report of venereal and vertical transmission of canine leishmaniosis from naturally infected dogs in Germany</title>
        <description>Background:
Canine leishmaniosis (CanL) is a zoonotic disease caused by Leishmania (L.) infantum. It is endemic to several tropical and subtropical countries but also to the Mediterranean region. It is transmitted by phlebotomine sandflies but occasional non-vector transmissions have been reported, including vertical and horizontal transmission.FindingsThe authors report a case of CanL in a female boxer dog from Dusseldorf, Germany, that had never been in an endemic region. A serum sample from the bitch was tested positive for antibodies against Leishmania (IFAT 1:2,000, ELISA 72). The bitch had whelped three litters, and one puppy from the third litter was also found to be seropositive for Leishmania antibodies (IFAT 1:4,000, ELISA 78).
Conclusions:
Up to now, despite intensive searching, the occurrence of sandflies could not be proved in the bitch&apos;s region of origin. Thus, vertical and horizontal transmission are to be discussed as possible ways of infection. This may be the first report of venereal and vertical transmission of L. infantum in naturally infected dogs in Germany.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/67</link>
                <dc:creator>Torsten Naucke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susanne Lorentz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2012, null:67</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-67</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>We report a case of canine leishmaniosis in a female boxer dog from central Germany, an area without the presence of sandflies. The infection was acquired venerally and transmitted vertically to one puppy of the next generation. Image: An IFAT, positive for Leishmania infantum.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-5-67-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/86">
        <title>Spatial and temporal dynamics of malaria transmission in rural Western Kenya 

</title>
        <description>Background:
Understanding the impact of reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission requires estimates of the relationship between health outcomes and exposure to infectious mosquitoes. However, measures of exposure such as mosquito density and entomological inoculation rate (EIR) are generally aggregated over large areas and time periods, biasing the outcome-exposure relationship. There are few studies examining the extent and drivers of local variation in malaria exposure in endemic areas.
Methods:
We describe the spatio-temporal dynamics of malaria transmission intensity measured by mosquito density and EIR in the KEMRI/CDC health and demographic surveillance system using entomological data collected during 2002-2004. Geostatistical zero inflated binomial and negative binomial models were applied to obtain location specific (house) estimates of sporozoite rates and mosquito densities respectively. Model-based predictions were multiplied to estimate the spatial pattern of annual entomological inoculation rate, a measure of the number of infective bites a person receive per unit of time. The models included environmental and climatic predictors extracted from satellite data, harmonic seasonal trends and parameters describing space-time correlation.
Results:
Anopheles gambiae s.l was the main vector species accounting for 86% (n=2309) of the total collected mosquitoes with the remainder being Anopheles funestus. Sixty eight percent (757/1110) of the surveyed houses had no mosquitoes. Distance to water bodies, vegetation and day temperature were significantly associated with mosquito density. Overall annual point estimates of EIR were 6.7, 9.3 and 9.6 infectious bites per annum for 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively. Monthly mosquito density and EIR varied over the study period peaking in May during the wet season. The predicted and observed densities and EIR showed a strong seasonal and spatial pattern over the study area.
Conclusions:
Spatio-temporal maps of malaria transmission intensity obtained in this study are not only useful in understanding variability in malaria epidemiology over small areas but also provides a high resolution exposure surface that can be used to analyse the impact of malaria exposure on mortality.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/86</link>
                <dc:creator>Nyaguara Amek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nabie Bayoh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Hamel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kim Lindblade</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Gimnig</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Odhiambo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kayla Laserson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laurence Slutsker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Penelope Vounatsou</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2012, null:86</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-86</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>This study describes the spatio-temporal dynamics of malaria transmission in rural western Kenya. Bayesian zero-inflated models were used to analyze sparse geostatistical entomological data and produce smooth maps of entomological inoculation rate (EIR). Image: Spatial variation of malaria transmission measured by EIR.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-5-86-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/77">
        <title>Teaching human parasitology in China</title>
        <description>China has approximately one-fifth of the world&apos;s population. Despite the recent success in controlling major parasitic diseases, parasitic diseases remain a significant human healthproblem in China. Hence, the discipline of human parasitology is considered as a core subject for undergraduate and postgraduate students of the medical sciences. We consider the teaching of human parasitology to be fundamental to the training of medical students, to the continued research on parasitic diseases, and to the prevention and control of human parasitic diseases. Here, we have summarized the distribution of educational institutions in China, particularly those that teach parasitology. In addition, we have described some existingparasitology courses in detail as well as the teaching methods used for different types of medical students. Finally, we have discussed the current problems in and reforms to humanparasitology education. Our study indicates that 304 regular higher education institutions in China offer medical or related education. More than 70 universities have an independentdepartment of parasitology that offers approximately 10 different parasitology courses. In addition, six universities in China have established excellence-building courses in human parasitology.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/77</link>
                <dc:creator>Guanghui Zhao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shenyi He</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lin Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Na Shi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Xing-Quan Zhu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2012, null:77</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-77</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>Here we have summarized the distribution of educational institutions in China. In addition, we have described some existing parasitology courses in detail. Finally, we have discussed the current problems in and reforms to human parasitology education.
Image: Chinese students  in a parasitology class.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-5-77-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/79">
        <title>Efficacy of slow-release collar formulations of imidacloprid/flumethrin and deltamethrin and of spot-on formulations of fipronil/(s) - methoprene, dinotefuran/pyriproxyfen/permethrin and (s) -methoprene/amitraz/fipronil against Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Ctenocephalides felis felis on dogs</title>
        <description>Background:
Two studies evaluating the efficacy of an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar (Seresto(R), Bayer Animal Health, IVP), a deltamethrin collar (Scalibor(R), MSD, CP1), a fipronil/(s)-methoprene spot-on (Frontline Combo(R), Merial, CP2), a dinotefuran/pyriproxyfen/permethrin spot-on (Vectra 3D(R), Ceva, CP3) and an amitraz/fipronil/(s)-methoprene spot-on (Certifect(R), Merial, CP4/CP5) against repeated infestations with Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Ctenocephalides felis felis on dogs were conducted over periods of 226 days and 71 days respectively.
Methods:
The first study comprised 4 groups of treated dogs and one untreated control group, and the second 3 groups of treated dogs and one control group. Each group consisted of 8 dogs. All dogs were infested with ticks and fleas at regular intervals. Ticks were counted 6 h, 18 h or 48 h after infestations and fleas 24 h after infestations. Efficacies of the treatments were calculated by comparison with the untreated control groups using standard descriptive statistics.
Results:
The protective 48 h tick efficacy was 97.8% to 100% for the IVP (226 days), 69.3% to 97.4% for CP1 (170 days), 99.6% to 43.4% for CP2 (35 days) and 98% to 61.4% for CP3 (35 days).The protective 18 h tick efficacy was 98% to 99.6% for the IVP (71 days), 100% to 86.5% for CP4 (29 days), 100% to 72.8% for CP4 after re-treatment (35 days) and 98.8% to 54.3% for CP5 (35 days).The protective 6 h tick efficacy was 85.6% at Day 7 and 90.1% to 97.1% from Day 14 onwards for the IVP (70 days), 92.3% to 70.7% for CP4 (35 days), 97.5% to 65.2% for CP4 after re-treatment (35 days) and 95.1% to 51.8% for CP5 (35 days).The protective 24 h flea efficacy was 99.5/90.9% to 100% for the IVP (71/226 days), 66.7% to 83% for CP1 (170 days), 100% to 88.5% for CP2 (35 days), 100% to 73.3% for CP3 (35 days), 100% to 98.7% for CP4 (35 days), 100% to 87.5% for CP4 after re-treatment (35 days) and 100% to 79.5% for CP5 (35 days).
Conclusions:
These data suggest that the long-term efficacy provided by a medicated collar that is effective, is a means to overcome the fluctuating efficacy of spot-on treatments resulting from a lack of pet owner re-treatment compliance, and consequently protect animals successfully against ectoparasites and probably vector-borne diseases.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/79</link>
                <dc:creator>Ivan Horak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josephus Fourie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dorothee Stanneck</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2012, null:79</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-79</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>A new antiparasitic collar, containing imidacloprid and flumethrin was compared with several marketed products with respect to flea and tick efficacy over the duration of 8 months.
Image: Rhipicephalus sanguineus, one of the parasite species tested.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-5-79-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/4/1/72">
        <title>Larvicidal effects of Chinaberry (Melia azederach) powder on Anopheles arabiensis in Ethiopia</title>
        <description>Background:
Synthetic insecticides are employed in the widely-used currently favored malaria control techniques involving indoor residual spraying and treated bednets. These methods have repeatedly proven to be highly effective at reducing malaria incidence and prevalence. However, rapidly emerging mosquito resistance to the chemicals and logistical problems in transporting supplies to remote locations threaten the long-term sustainability of these techniques. Chinaberry (Melia azederach) extracts have been shown to be effective growth-inhibiting larvicides against several insects. Because several active chemicals in the trees&apos; seeds have insecticidal properties, the emergence of resistance is unlikely. Here, we investigate the feasibility of Chinaberry as a locally available, low-cost sustainable insecticide that can aid in controlling malaria. Chinaberry fruits were collected from Asendabo, Ethiopia. The seeds were removed from the fruits, dried and crushed into a powder. From developmental habitats in the same village, Anopheles arabiensis larvae were collected and placed into laboratory containers. Chinaberry seed powder was added to the larval containers at three treatment levels: 5 g m-2, 10 g m-2 and 20 g m-2, with 100 individual larvae in each treatment level and a control. The containers were monitored daily and larvae, pupae and adult mosquitoes were counted. This experimental procedure was replicated three times.
Results:
Chinaberry seed powder caused an inhibition of emergence of 93% at the 5 g m-2 treatment level, and 100% inhibition of emergence at the two higher treatment levels. The Chinaberry had a highly statistically significant larvicidal effect at all treatment levels (&#967;2 = 184, 184, and 155 for 5 g m-2, 10 g m-2 and 20 g m-2, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001 in all cases). In addition, estimates suggest that sufficient Chinaberry seed exists in Asendabo to treat developmental habitat for the duration of the rainy season and support a field trial.
Conclusions:
Chinaberry seed is a very potent growth-inhibiting larvicide against the major African malaria vector An. arabiensis. The seed could provide a sustainable additional malaria vector control tool that can be used where the tree is abundant and where An. arabiensis is a dominant vector. Based on these results, a future village-scale field trial using the technique is warranted.</description>
        <link>http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/4/1/72</link>
                <dc:creator>Ryan Trudel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arne Bomblies</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Parasites &amp; Vectors 2011, null:72</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-05-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-3305-4-72</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>This study confirms the larvicidal potency of Chinaberry (Melia azederach) seed, which may provide a truly sustainable, locally sourced method for controlling the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in Ethiopia. Image: The larvicidal Chinaberry (Melia azederach) fruit and seeds.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1756-3305-4-72-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Parasites &amp; Vectors</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-3305</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-05-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

