Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Parasites & Vectors and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Short report

Colonization of Anopheles cracens: a malaria vector of emerging importance

Amirah Amir, Jia Siang Sum, Yee Ling Lau*, Indra Vythilingam and Mun Yik Fong

Author Affiliations

Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia

For all author emails, please log on.

Parasites & Vectors 2013, 6:81  doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-81

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/6/1/81


Received:16 January 2013
Accepted:22 March 2013
Published:28 March 2013

© 2013 Amir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Anopheles cracens has been incriminated as a vector for the simian malaria parasite, Plasmodium knowlesi, that is the fifth Plasmodium species infecting humans. Little experimental data exists on this mosquito species due to the lack of its availability in laboratories.

Findings

The population of An. cracens, collected from Kuala Lipis, Pahang was maintained at the insectary of the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya at 24-26°C and 60-80% relative humidity. The mosquitoes were maintained with artificial mating and blood-fed on humans and hamsters. The colony has been established since November 2011 and to date has reached its sixth generation.

Conclusion

This is the first description of maintaining the Malaysian strain An. cracens colony by artificial mating. Colonization of An. cracens will provide fundamental information for genetic studies and will be useful in assessing comparative susceptibility to Plasmodium parasites.

Keywords:
Vector; Transmission; Malaria; Gonotrophic cycle; Lifecycle; Anopheles cracens

Findings

Introduction

The Anopheles Leucosphyrus group of mosquitoes play a significant role as simian malaria vectors in South-east Asia. Three of its members which are known to be efficient vectors for human malaria parasites include An. balabacensis Baisas, An. dirus Peyton and Harrison, and An. leucosphyrus Doesnitz (now known as An. latens) [1]. Species of the An. dirus complex can be found from India to Taiwan and from the 30° north parallel to the Malaysian peninsular and the northern tip of Sumatra, Indonesia [2]. Anopheles cracens (=An. dirus B) [3] was found in southern Thailand, Perlis, Terengganu (peninsular Malaysia) and Sumatra, Indonesia [3,4]. Recent studies have shown that An. cracens is also present in Kuala Lipis Pahang (peninsular Malaysia) [5,6].

A study comparing seven South-east Asian Anopheles species with An. dirus showed that An. cracens has one of the highest susceptibilities to Plasmodium cynomolgi B strain (simian malaria) [7]. Besides being recently established as the main vector for P. knowlesi in Kuala Lipis, An. cracens has also been proven to be an efficient laboratory vector for both P. falciparum and P. vivax[5,8]. Upon comparing filarial vector competence between An. stephensi, Aedes aegypti, An. gambiae and An. cracens, the latter was shown to be involved in the transmission of Brugia pahangi[9].

Many aspects of the vector-parasite relationship need to be studied to better understand their importance in the epidemiology of knowlesi malaria. These studies await the availability of an adequate supply of laboratory bred colony material. Thus, the current study presents the successful colonization and maintenance of An. cracens in the laboratory.

Methods

A total of 41 female An. cracens were caught using the bare leg landing method in Kuala Lipis, Pahang (N04°12.584’ E101°52.515’) in November 2011. This project was approved by the Ethical and Research Review Committee of the Ministry of Health, Malaysia NMRR-11-1050-110619. Two of the caught An. cracens were genotyped, two more were pinned as a reference collection and the remaining 37 female mosquitoes were used for establishment of the colony which to date has reached its sixth generation. The collection was carried out between 18:30 and 21:30 hours for two consecutive days. Each mosquito was caught using a 50 × 19 mm specimen glass tubes with its base covered in moist tissue paper to provide humidity and its top covered with cotton wool to prevent escape. The mosquitoes were morphologically identified using keys of Reid and Sallum [3,10].

DNA from two morphologically identified An. cracens were extracted for rDNA ITS2 and cytochrome oxidase c subunit I (COI mtDNA) sequence analysis [11-13]. The rDNA ITS2 was amplified using primers ITS2A and ITS2B. PCR was performed according to Beebe and Saul [11]. The COI gene was amplified using primers UEA9.2 and UEA10.2. PCR was performed according to Sallum et al.[13]. The PCR products were sent to a commercial laboratory for sequencing.

The remaining caught An. cracens were transferred into paper cups covered with netting lids and blood fed by introducing a human arm. After two days, five blood fed mosquitoes were transferred to each oviposition pot (9 cm in diameter, 7 cm high) lined with wet filter paper and covered with a netting lid. Eggs laid by these mosquitoes were used to establish the laboratory colony.

Upon hatching, the larvae and remaining eggs were transferred into a larval rearing pan (white plastic tray, 20 × 30 × 5 cm), half filled with dechlorinated water. Approximately 200 larvae were transferred into each of these larval rearing pans. The larval food comprised of the following, which were finely ground: 100 g dog biscuits, 200 g nestum, 10 g yeast, 50 g liver powder and 10 g vitamin B complex. To first instar larvae, 0.03 mg larval food was provided and this was gradually increased from 0.03 mg to a maximum of 0.12 mg as the larvae increased in size. Pupae were removed daily with a pipette and placed in plastic containers (9 cm in diameter, 7 cm high) containing dechlorinated water and placed in a screened cage (30 × 30 × 30 cm) for emergence. Emerged adults were provided with a 10% sugar solution with vitamin B complex.

Adult females that were at least five days old were starved for 24 h before being allowed to feed on hamsters or human arm. Engorged females were removed and mated with three to four day old males using the forced mating method as described [14]. Similar to the artificial mating of An. labranchiae and An. freeborni, removal of the male’s head was not necessary although stimulation of the male was more rapid when decapitated [15,16]. During forced mating, the median time for the mosquitoes to remain joined was 21 s (range: 8–480 s, n = 237) after which, the female is released by the male. The same male was used to mate with a maximum of three females. This was based on Baker’s findings, which showed that insemination occurred only in the first three females [17]. Furthermore, an experiment with one male An. pseudopunctipennis mating with three successive females showed that the first, second and third mating led to 70%, 90% and 40% of fertilized females respectively [17,18].

After artificial mating, females were introduced singly into a plastic cup (4 cm in diameter, 5.5 cm high) lined with filter paper and provided with a 10% sugar solution with vitamin B complex. After three days, water was added to the filter paper and female mosquitoes were allowed to oviposit. Up to 60-91% of the females, which laid eggs were from the first mating, followed by 9-40% from the second mating and 7-10% from the third mating. Female mosquitoes that did not lay eggs by day seven and those which had already laid eggs were given a second blood feed before allowing them to oviposit again. The insectory was maintained at 24-26°C at 60-80% relative humidity, illuminated with a combination of natural light and fluorescent lighting for an average of 12 h a day.

Results and discussion

Sequence analysis of rDNA ITS2 and cytochrome oxidase c subunit I (COI mtDNA) from two morphologically identified An. cracens confirmed its species [11-13]. Most comprehensive data was obtained from F2 generation onwards. A total of 517 An. cracens made up the F2 generation with a female to male ratio of 1.23:1. This was followed with a total of 519, 272, 182 and 516 An. cracens, which made up the F3, F4, F5 and F6 generation respectively. Female to male ratios for F3 up to F6 generation did not vary much, ranging between 1:0.8 to 1:1.06. The maximum lifespan of the adult female and male in our laboratory was 77 and 51 days respectively. A mean of 3.26 males and 3.22 females died each day. The survival rate, defined as the percentage of mosquitoes that survived 30 days, were 13.9% for males and 31.6% for females.

Less than 25% of the adult females which underwent forced mating oviposited, with 18.5% of oviposition occurring by day four post bloodmeal. The remaining adult females oviposited after day five with the longest viable eggs being laid fourteen days after blood feeding. The average number of deposited eggs per individual F2 female was 123.1 ± 71.3 (range: 25–245, n = 9). This figure varied with subsequent generations as shown in Table 1. These numbers are comparable with other laboratory reared Anopheles species such as An. maculatus, 80–100 eggs per female, An. albimanus, 80122 eggs per female and An. fluviatilis, 68–78 eggs per female [12,19,20].

Table 1. Laboratory colonization of An. cracens under insectory and ambient conditions

The eggs hatched after two days, into first instar larvae. Pupation started on the seventh day of hatching. The adults emerged after two days of pupal stage. The observation showed that 62.6%, 77.8%, 65.4% and 87.3% of the eggs laid by F2, F3, F4 and F5 females respectively, successfully matured and emerged into adults.

Blood feeding proves to be challenging in An. cracens colonies. Female An. cracens did not feed on white mice or gerbils in our laboratory. Hamsters showed potential as some females fed on them. The mosquitoes remain highly attracted to humans for blood feeding. Other Anopheles species, which were maintained using hamsters for blood feeding includes An. philippinensis and An. albimanus[19,21]. Other animals successfully used for blood feeding include rabbits for An. fluviatilis, An. pseudopunctipennis[18,20,22] and An. gambiae and guinea pig for An. maculatus[14].

Although it was found that An. cracens (An. balabacensis, Perlis form) was a stenogamic species in the laboratory [23], it was not the case with this species in Malaysia. One of the most important requirements for successful colonization is personal dedication and care. This includes carrying out procedures at stipulated times. For example, after blood feeding and mating, mosquitoes must be set for egg laying after 3 days. Larvae should not be over fed. Overcrowding of both larvae and adults should be avoided.

Colonies of free mating An. cracens have been established in Chiang Mai University, Thailand [24-26]. However, the rearing protocol was not published. This is the first description of maintaining the Malaysian strain An. cracens colony by artificial mating. Gonotrophic cycle was established as 3–5 days. Colonization of An. cracens will enable us to gain insight into the evolutionary and speciation history of An. cracens specifically and on the Anopheles genus as a whole. If possible, we will also be looking at morphological variance with other existing colonies. This colony will also be useful in assessing comparative susceptibility to various Plasmodium parasites.

Abbreviations

rDNA: Ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid; ITS2: Internal transcribed spacer 2.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LYL, FMY and IV conceived the concept of the project. AA, SJS, IV and LYL conducted the field trip and mosquito catching. AA and SJS maintained the mosquito colony in the laboratory. AA wrote the first draft of the manuscript and LYL, FMY and IV revised it. All other authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the UM High Impact Research Grant UM-MOHE UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/18 from the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia and University Malaya Postgraduate Research Fund (PV044-2012A).

References

  1. Peyton EL: A new classification for the Leucosphyrus Group of Anopheles (Cellia).

    Mosq Syst 1989, 21:197-205. OpenURL

  2. Obsomer V, Defourny P, Coosemans M: The Anopheles dirus complex: spatial distribution and environmental drivers.

    Malaria J 2007, 6:26. BioMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Sallum MAM, Peyton EL, Wilkerson RC: Six new species of the Anopheles leucosphyrus group, reinterpretation of An. elegans and vector implications.

    Med Vet Entomol 2005, 19:158-199. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Sallum MAM, Peyton EL, Harrison BA, Wilkerson RC: Revision of the Leucosphyrus group of Anopheles (Celia) (Diptera, Culicidae).

    Rev Bras Entomol 2005, 49(1):1-152. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Vythilingam I, NoorAzian YM, Huat TC, Jiram AI, Yusri YM, Azahari AH, NorParina I, NoorRain A, LokmanHakim S: Plasmodium knowlesi in humans, macaques and mosquitoes in peninsular Malaysia.

    Parasit Vectors 2008, 1:26. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  6. Jiram AI, Vythilingam I, NoorAzian YM, Yusri YM, Azahari AH, Fong MY: Entomologic investigation of Plasmodium knowlesi vectors in Kuala Lipis, Pahang.

    Malaysia. Malaria J 2012, 11:213. BioMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  7. Klein TA, Harrison BA, Dixon SV, Burge JR: Comparative susceptibility of Southeast Asian Anopheles mosquitoes to the simian malaria parasite Plasmodium cynomolgi.

    J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1991, 7:481-487. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  8. Junkum A, Jitpakdi A, Jariyapan N, Komalamisra N, Somboon P, Suqonkerd W, Saejeng A, Bates PA, Choochote W: Susceptibility of two karyotypic forms of Anopheles aconitus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax.

    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2005, 47:333-338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Zahedi M, White GB: Filaria vector competence of some Anopheles species.

    Trop Med Parasitol 1994, 45:27-32. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  10. Reid JA: Anopheline mosquitoes of Malaya and Borneo.

    Stud Inst Med Res Malaysia 1968, 31:520. OpenURL

  11. Beebe NW, Saul A: Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995, 53:478-481. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Walton C, Handley JM, Kuvangkadilok C, Collins FH, Harbach RE, Baimai V, Butlin RK: Identification of five species of the Anopheles dirus complex from Thailand, using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.

    Med Vet Entomol 1999, 13:24-32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Sallum MAM, Foster PG, Li C, Sithiprasasna R, Wilkerson RC: Phylogeny of the Leucosphyrus Group of Anopheles (Cellia)(Diptera: Culicidae) Based on Mitochondrial Gene Sequences.

    Ann Entomol Soc Am 2007, 100:27-35. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Ow-Yang CK, Sta Maria FL, Wharton RH: Maintenance of laboratory colony of Anopheles maculatus Theobald by artificial mating.

    Mosq News 1963, 23:34-35. OpenURL

  15. Caravaglios N: Accoppiamento artificial senza decapitazione del maschio in Anopheles labranchiae.

    Fall Riv Parassit 1961, 22:149-151. OpenURL

  16. Baker RH, French WL, Kitzmiller JB: Induced copulation in Anopheles mosquitoes.

    Mosq News 1962, 22:16-17. OpenURL

  17. Baker RH: Mating problems as related to the establishment and maintenance of laboratory colonies of mosquitoes.

    Bull W.H.O 1964, 31:467-468. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  18. Lardeux F, Quispe V, Tejerina R, Rodriguez R, Torrez L, Bouchite B, Chavez T: Laboratory colonization of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) without forced mating.

    C.R Biologies 2001, 330:571-575. OpenURL

  19. Zerpa N, Moreno J, González J, Noya O: Colonization and laboratory maintenance of Anopheles albimanus Wiedemann in Venezuela.

    Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 1998, 40(3):173-176. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  20. Mehrunnisa A, Adak T, Singh OP, Nanda N, Dua VK, Hardev P, Kahn W: Laboratory colonization of Anopheles fluviatilis species T and U.

    J Med Entomol 2011, 48(2):395-397. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Terry AK, Bruce AH, Inkam I, Prajim B: Colonization of Thailand strains of Anopheles nivipes and Anopheles philippinensis.

    Mosq News 1982, 42:373-381. OpenURL

  22. Tchuinkam T, Mpoame M, Make-Mveinhya B, Simard F, Lele-Defo E, Zebaze-Togouet S, Tateng-Ngouateu A, Awono-Ambene HP, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Nijine Y, Fontenille D: Optimization of breeding output for larval stage of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera:Culicidae): prospects for the creation and maintenance of laboratory colony from wild isolates.

    B Entomol Res 2011, 101:259-269. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Sucharit S, Choochote W: Comparative studies on the morphometry of male genitalia and frequency of clasper movements during induced copulation of An. balabacensis (Perlis form) and An. dirus (Bangkok colony strain).

    Mosq Syst 1983, 15:90-98. OpenURL

  24. Baimai V: Speciation and species complexes of the Anopheles malaria vectors in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: The Third Conference on Malaria Research; 1989:146-152. OpenURL

  25. Joshi D, Choochote W, Park MH, Kim JY, Kim TS, Suwonkerd W, Min GS: The susceptibility of Anopheles lesteri to infection with Korean strain of Plasmodium vivax.

    Malaria J 2009, 8:42. BioMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  26. Wongtrakul J, Pongjaroenkit S, Leelapat P, Nachaiwieng W, Prapanthadara LA, Ketterman AJ: Expression and characterization of three new glutathione transferases, an Epsilon (AcGSTE2-2), Omega (AcGST01-1), and Theta (AcGSTT1-1) from Anopheles cracens (Diptera: Culicidae), a major Thai malaria vector.

    J Med Entomol 2010, 47(2):162-171. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL