Skip to main content

Are protozoan metacaspases potential parasite killers?

Abstract

Mechanisms concerning life or death decisions in protozoan parasites are still imperfectly understood. Comparison with higher eukaryotes has led to the hypothesis that caspase-like enzymes could be involved in death pathways. This hypothesis was reinforced by the description of caspase-related sequences in the genome of several parasites, including Plasmodium, Trypanosoma and Leishmania. Although several teams are working to decipher the exact role of metacaspases in protozoan parasites, partial, conflicting or negative results have been obtained with respect to the relationship between protozoan metacaspases and cell death. The aim of this paper is to review current knowledge of protozoan parasite metacaspases within a drug targeting perspective.

Metacaspases: a twenty-first century history

In the late nineties, Aravind from Bethesda was the first to describe orthologues of caspases [1]. This paved the way for Uren and colleagues to describe paracaspases from animals and slime mould, and metacaspases from plants, fungi and protozoa, in the beginning of 21st century [2]. Caspases are limited to metazoans, while metacaspases are missing from them: leading to the hypothesis that metacaspases resemble ancestral proteases and that caspases have diverged through evolution under environmental stresses. Approximately a hundred papers were published during the first decade of the new century: mostly studying the role of metacaspase in apoptosis in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for example [3, 4]. While the involvement of yeast metacaspase in cell death is well documented [5, 6], a non-death role for the yeast metacaspase Yca1p has also been described [7]. More recently, authors have strongly expressed their disagreement with the classification of metacaspases as part of the caspases family [8]. It was argued that the specificity of these enzymes should determine their classification, rather than any similarities. Other papers with definitive titles ("Are metacaspases caspases?" [9] and "Metacaspases are caspases. Doubt no more" [10]) were published, demonstrating the vitality of the debate. Whether this controversy will address issues of medical importance is debatable. However, it demonstrated the requirement to explore the role of metacaspases, as an aid to determining whether renaming these enzymes in agreement with their definitive specificity is needed.

Although only recently described and their function poorly explored, metacaspases could be considered as potential targets for new specific treatments against the main protozoan parasites affecting humans. Elucidating their role in physiology is certainly a requirement, but it is clear that addressing this issue could provide new insights into the fight against tropical diseases.

Structure/Activity of metacaspases

Peptidases are classified in the MEROPS database http://merops.sanger.ac.uk using "clans" and "families" features. All the sequences in the same clan are evolutionarily-related, determined by similarities in protein tertiary structures and share a similar protein fold [11]. A peptidase clan consists of two letters, the first designating the catalytic type, for example A for aspartic acid, C for cysteine, S for serine. Because some cysteine, serine and threonine peptidases have similar folds, the letter "P" is used for clans of mixed catalytic type. Among the peptidases forming a transient covalent bond between the substrate and the enzyme, serine, threonine and cysteine peptidases are well described [12].

Metacaspases (MCA) are cysteine proteases with structural similarity to caspases and a catalytic cysteine-histidine dyad. Caspases and metacaspases are members of the C14 family, clan CD, with probable differences in substrate specificity [13]. Surprisingly, it was recently demonstrated that two different type 1 metacaspases from a plant (Arabidopsis thaliana) differentially regulate superoxide-dependant cell death: AtMC1 is a pro-death caspase-like protein while AtMC2 antagonizes this function [14]. Metacaspases have a highly acidic S1 pocket leading to a basic specificity for arginine and lysine at the P1 position, rather than aspartic acid specificity as seen for caspases [12, 15].

Differences in substrate specificity between metacaspases and caspases lead to uncertainty concerning the potential role of protozoan metacaspases in apoptosis-like cell death, and it has been proposed that metacaspases and paracaspases should be separated in a specific family in clan CD [9]. Nevertheless, it was recently demonstrated that caspases and metacaspases can both target the Tudor Staphylococcal Nuclease (TSN) [16]. TSN is an evolutionary conserved protein, composed of a single Tudor domain and five staphylococcal nuclease-like domains, and is involved in a number of transcriptional and post-transcriptional pathways. Homo sapiens TSN sequence shows a consensus cleavage site for caspase-3, and proteolysis of TSN is blocked after treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk. Although the DAVD caspase-3 cleavage motif is absent from protozoa, fungi and plants, TSN proteins from the plant Picea abies were found to contain several metacaspase cleavage sites [16]. The ability of caspase from vertebrate and type 2 metacaspase from plant to cleave the same substrate with a central role in the cell degradome provides new evidence that metacaspase could be involved in apoptosis control [16].

Plasmodium Metacaspases

While insecticide-treated bednets, Artemisinin-based combined therapy (ACTs) and climatic changes have transformed the global impact of malaria in endemic areas, this parasitic disease remains a major life-threatening challenge for millions of people. ACTs are the drugs of choice for non-severe malaria, but parasite resistance is speculated to appear in the near future [17]. Thus, it is of utmost importance to decipher the mechanisms of parasite growth control, in order to detect new drug targets; potentially not subjected to resistance. Apoptosis-like DNA fragmentation of Plasmodium falciparum parasite in response to chloroquine treatment was described more than a decade ago [18]. It was speculated that resistance to chloroquine was related to inhibition of apoptosis. Plasmodium berghei features of apoptosis including condensation of chromatin, DNA fragmentation and externalisation of phosphatidylserine were demonstrated a few years later [19]. Proteins with caspase-like activity were identified in the cytoplasm of the ookinete, and more than 50% of the mosquito midgut stages of the parasite die naturally by apoptosis before gut invasion. This phenomenon was prevented by a caspase inhibitor [19].

Metacaspase, as well as clans CA, CD and CE proteases have been described in Plasmodium [20]. Clan CA proteases are the best-characterised cysteine proteases of Plasmodium (Table 1). The major functions of clan CA proteases, including falcipains, concerned with hemoglobin hydrolysis and erythrocyte rupture or invasion was extensively reviewed a few years ago [21]. However, few studies have been conducted to decipher the role of Plasmodium metacaspases [22, 23].

Table 1 Key features on Plasmodium metacaspases

Three MCAs were described in the genome of the two major human malaria parasites, P. falciparum (PfMCA1-3) and P. vivax (PvMCA1-3), and in the murine parasite P. berghei (PbMCA1-3). PxMCA1 is the only enzyme that presents the well-characterized histidine and cysteine catalytic dyad. Patterns of expression seem to differ between PfMCA1 and PbMCA1. PfMCA1 gene expression was described in the erythrocytic stage [Meslin et al, unpublished observations], PbMCA1 expression was detected in female gametocytes, in oocysts and in sporozoites, but authors [23] failed to demonstrate a significant level of ookinetes apoptosis compared to other studies [19, 24], and did not observe differences between wild-type (WT) and PbMCA1-KO ookinetes, leading to the conclusion that functional redundancy may exist, probably through PbMCA2/3 activity. It should be kept in mind that apoptosis of normal parasites may occur in specific conditions that lead to a message of death. A more comprehensive study of the role of metacaspase in Plasmodium biology should be conducted in the presence of one such message. In a recent study, Plasmodium falciparum metacaspase expression was measured during parasite culture in vitro, showing a relationship with parasitemia levels and suggesting a role in growth regulation [25]. These preliminary results provide some more evidence for a role of metacaspase in Plasmodium fitness.

The expression of PfMCA1 C14 peptidase domain in yca1 deficient S. cerevisiae led to growth retardation and a drastic yeast cell death [Meslin et al, unpublished observations]. Interestingly, this phenotype could be blocked by the addition of the pan caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk while PfMCA1 did not exhibit a caspase-like, but an arginine protease activity, as reported for other protozoan MCAs [Meslin et al, unpublished observations]. PfMCA1 could play an initiator role leading to the activation of an aspartate protease effector. This hypothesis is in agreement with the description of PfMCA1 autoprocessing leading to prodomain removal as typical of initiator caspases [22]. PfMCA1 function could to be regulated by the two putative binding domains described: a C2 calcium-dependant membrane targeting domain and a CARD domain (Caspase Recruitment Domain) [22, 23]. Interestingly, Plasmodium falciparum Tudor Staphylococcal Nuclease was recently described and some of its interacting proteins were detected using two-hybrid analysis, co-localization and co-immunoprecipitation [26, 27]. Plasmodium Tudor SN exhibits RNA binding and nuclease activity. Whether Plasmodium Tudor SN could be a substrate for metacaspase is still unknown, but it probably has a central role in the parasite life cycle.

Trypanosomatids Metacaspases

The kinetoplastid protozoan, Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi and several Leishmania species cause, respectively, sleeping sickness, Chagas disease and various forms of leishmaniasis [28, 29]. Together, these pathogenic agents affect millions of people across the world, especially in developing countries, where they are often totally mismanaged (WHO/TDR, http://www.who.int/tdr). Metacaspases have been identified and partially described in all trypanosomatids and with the recent discovery of anti-metacaspase inhibitors, further research in this area may prove to be clinically significant.

1 - Trypanosoma

In the African trypanosome, T. brucei, five genes encoding metacaspases (TbMCA1-TbMCA5) are expressed (Table 2). At the protein level, TbMCA2 and TbMCA3 are highly similar (89% of sequence identity), with the difference ascribed to putative organelle targeting-domain at the N-terminus of TbMCA3. TbMCA5 has a central domain, typical of a metacaspase, as well as an additional C-terminal extension [13]. Importantly, TbMCA1 and TbMCA4 have amino-acid substitutions in their conserved metacaspase catalytic residues (histidine to tyrosine and cysteine to serine in TbMCA1; cysteine to serine in TbMCA4) and are therefore expected to be enzymatically inactive [13].

Table 2 Key features on Trypanosoma metacaspases

Metacaspases have also been studied in their physiological context, TbMCA2 and TbMCA3 are reportedly expressed only in the bloodstream form of the parasite whereas TbMCA5 is detectable throughout the parasite life cycle, where they appear to play a role in the recycling of endosomes co-localising with RAB11 in recycling vesicles [30]. Further, sequential genetic deletion of TbMCA2, TbMCA3 and TbMCA5 did not lead to cell death and even triple knockout parasites were able to recover growth rates comparable to wild-type cells. On the other hand, a rapid down-regulation of their expression using RNA-interference led to a pre-cytokinesis cell-cycle blockade; perhaps because there was inefficient time for the hypothesized compensation [13]. All five metacaspases have been studied in the heterologous organism S. cerevisiae, where only TbMCA4 over-expression resulted in growth inhibition and cell death. Interestingly, it was shown to be localised in the nucleus and appeared to play a role at the mitochondrial level by inducing a loss of respiratory competence in yeast cells [31].

TbMCA2 has been further biochemically characterised; it has arginine/lysine specificity at substrate P1 position [32] similar to plant metacaspases [9, 33]. Despite the fact that it is auto-cleaved at lysine positions, this processing does not seem to be important for its enzymatic activity. TbMCA2 also showed a strict calcium dependency that could reach 1 mM for maximum activity; a biological concentration only encountered in acidocalcisomes. However, no experimental evidence has yet linked TbMCA2 to these compartments [32].

So far, T. brucei metacaspases (especially TbMCA2, TbMCA3 and TbMC5) appear to be essential in the bloodstream form of the parasite [30] and could have potential as clinically viable drug targets to fight sleeping sickness.

T. cruzi expresses two metacaspase proteins, one homologous to TbMCA2 (named TcMCA3) and a second homologous to TbMCA5 (named TcMCA5) [34]. The TcMCA3 gene is present in 16 copies per haploid genome and the encoded protein has been found to be expressed during the entire parasitic life cycle, whereas TcMCA5 is present as a single copy and the expressed protein is only found in the epimastigote form of the parasite. Attempts to biochemically characterize these MCAs have been unsuccessful, however Kosec et al. were able to show that TcMCAs could be involved in the apoptosis of the parasite as they found them to relocalise from the cytoplasm to the nucleus during apoptosis induced by fresh human serum [34]. A further caspase-like activity was reported and is most likely due to a downstream protease.

Five studies have been conducted during the last decade to explore the presence and the role of metacaspases in Trypanosoma brucei and T. cruzi parasites in vitro. While interesting information was obtained on similarities between Trypanosoma metacaspases and caspase families, proof that metacaspase activity could be similar to caspase and involved in apoptosis-like cell death is still lacking.

2 - Leishmania

All Leishmania species express one single metacaspase gene except in infantum and donovani subtypes where two metacaspases have been found encoded as GeneDB http://www.genedb.org. Leishmania metacaspases have a high sequence homology (77.4 to 99.8%). Structurally, they share an N-terminal domain containing a putative mitochondrial-localisation signal, a central metacaspase domain (containing the conserved catalytic dyad histidine and cysteine) and a less conserved proline-rich C-terminal domain (61.4 to 100% homology), which probably plays a role in protein-protein interactions [35] (Table 3).

Table 3 Key features on Leishmania metacaspases

In L. donovani, LdMC1 and LdMC2 were reportedly expressed in both promastigote and axenic amastigote forms of the parasite. They exhibit an arginine/lysine-specific activity without any requirement for proteolytic activation, neither in normal conditions nor upon oxidative stress-induced PCD. LdMCs have been found to be localised in the acidocalcisomes where they have been purportedly sequestered as inactive enzymes which are released upon apoptosis induction using oxygen peroxide (H2O2), as measured by the increase in metacaspase activity and TUNEL positive cells [36]. In L. major, the single metacaspase (LmjMCA) was found to be able to replace yeast metacaspase (YCA1) in the H2O2-induced death phenotype of S. cerevisiae [35]. Although it has similar activities towards arginine and lysine, in contrast to LdMCs LmjMCA was reported to be activated by autoprocessing and the purified putative catalytic domain was 300 times more active than the non-purified full-length LmjMCA [35].

The H2O2-induced death role of LmjMCA has been further characterized within the parasite. LmjMCA over-expression was found to enhance L. major sensitivity to oxidative stress as measured by the increase of phosphatidylserine exposure at the parasites surface and the rapid loss of mitochondrial membrane potential as compared to wild-type parasites expressing the endogenous metacaspase at physiological levels. LmjMCA was found to be extensively processed and the catalytic domain and accumulated in the cytosolic subcellular fraction when apoptosis was induced by either H2O2, heat shock or anti-Leishmania drugs such as miltefosine or curcumin. Even though LmjMCA has a functional N-terminal mitochondrial localisation signal, which is likely to be responsible for the partial LmjMCA mitochondrial localisation, the central catalytic domain alone was sufficient to enhance the parasite sensitivity to cell death indicating that the metacaspase would indirectly affect the mitochondrion to trigger cell death [37].

Interestingly, a non-death role has also been ascribed to LmjMCA when analyzed in its physiological context. LmjMCA was found to be expressed in actively replicating amastigotes and procyclic promastigotes, but to a lesser extent in metacyclics. It has a diffuse scattered distribution throughout the cell in interphase, becoming concentrated in the kinetoplast during organelle segregation and relocalising to the nucleus during mitosis. Here, it associates with the mitotic spindle, suggesting a role during organelle segregation and cell-cycle progression. Moreover, LmjMCA null mutants were only viable when LmjMCA was re-expressed from an episome at physiological levels, thus reinforcing its importance in parasite proliferation [38].

The discrepancies in metacaspase function and localisation range from a single metacaspase fulfilling several roles (as in L. major), to multiple metacaspases with structural and functional differences (as in T. brucei). From an evolutionary perspective, these could be of great interest as they could be used to trace the origin of the multiple roles fulfilled by the closely related caspases in metazoans.

Targeting metacaspases to kill parasites

Caspase inhibitors are under scrutiny by several groups working on infectious diseases in humans where apoptosis promotes tissue damage. Attempts were made to understand the mechanisms involved in caspase control in human cells, in order to control pathogen-induced apoptosis. Caspase inhibitors have been tested in pre-clinical studies with various models of acute or chronic liver failure. The pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk decreased rat mortality after massive hepatectomy [39] and IDN-6556 reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat [40, 41]. This latter compound was used in proof-of-concept trial with patient presenting viral hepatitis C [42] and in human liver preservation injury trial [43]. These trials, leading to inhibit human cells apoptosis, are far from the goal to induce parasite apoptosis in vivo. However, this shows that apoptosis control could be one of the most stimulating challenges for the future. Inhibiting human cells apoptosis to avoid tissue injury could promote cancer if the intrinsic pathway is targeted. In contrast, stimulating parasite apoptosis to increase the anti-parasitic drug efficacy could promote human cell destruction from a similar mechanism.

Considering the specificity of metacaspases activity in protozoan parasites and their absence in humans, a new research area has opened to characterize metacaspase activators or inhibitors.

Recently, a series of inhibitors have been evaluated as competitive inhibitors of TbMCA2 and 3, and on T. brucei, T. cruzi, L. infantum and P. falciparum parasites cultures in vitro [44]. Activities against these protozoan parasites were in the micromolar range, far from what would be needed, but the high selectivity for TbMCA2 and TbMCA3, is a first interesting step.

Whether or not protozoan metacaspases are directly involved in parasite cell death per se, it could be speculated that their conservation in parasites presenting a long history of adaptation to environment implies that metacaspases are key regulators of the parasite life or death decision. Thus, metacaspases should be considered as potential drug target for the future. Consideration of trials in progress using drugs designed to facilitate apoptosis of cancer cells in humans leads to speculation that similar strategies could be used to induce protozoan death at different stages of their life cycles.

Thus, it is of utmost importance to explore deeply the pathways involved in parasite apoptosis, and the key regulatory proteins that mediate cell death. In human cells, these pathways are tightly regulated at multiple steps, including through phosphorylation [45]. For example, phosphorylation of human caspase 9 Thr125 by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK1) - cyclin B1 inhibits caspase 9 activation. That phosphorylation is inhibited by the protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine. Additional sites of phosphorylation in caspase 9 were also reported (Ser 196, Ser 144, Ser 183, Ser195, Tyr 153, etc.) with different effects on cell apoptosis [45]. It could thus be speculated that parasite metacaspases could also be regulated by phosphorylation at specific stages of parasite cycles, and this should be taken into account to provide definitive data on the role of metacaspase in parasite death and as a drug target.

Finally, the high homology among protozoan metacaspases and the fact that these proteins are not present in mammals make them good candidates as drug targets to fight parasitic diseases. A future drug should be designed to activate the metacaspase pathway in order to favour parasite death, either directly or through the inhibition of one of the numerous negative controls suspected to be present in fast growing parasites. Inhibition of human cells apoptosis induced by parasitic diseases [46] combined with induction of parasite apoptosis at the initial steps of the infection is an integrative concept for future treatment that still needs to be proven. In both cases, recent breakthroughs in knowledge allow reasonable optimism.

References

  1. Aravind L, Dixit VM, Koonin EV: The domains of death: evolution of the apoptosis machinery. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999, 24: 47-53. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01341-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uren AG, O'Rourke K, Aravind LA, Pisabarro MT, Seshagiri S, Koonin EV, Dixit VM: Identification of paracaspases and metacaspases: two ancient families of caspase-like proteins, one of which plays a key role in MALT lymphoma. Mol Cell. 2000, 6: 961-967.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Madeo F, Herker E, Maldener C, Wissing S, Lächelt S, Herlan M, Fehr M, Lauber K, Sigrist SJ, Wesselborg S, Fröhlich KU: A caspase-related protease regulates apoptosis in yeast. Mol Cell. 2002, 9: 911-7. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00501-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan MA, Chock PB, Stadtman ER: Knockout of caspase-like gene, YCA1, abrogates apoptosis and elevates oxidized proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (173): 26-31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mazzoni C, Falcone C: Caspase-dependent apoptosis in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 783: 1320-7. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.02.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Váchová L, Palková Z: Caspases in yeast apoptosis-like death: facts and artefacts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007, 7: 12-21. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00137.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee RE, Puente LG, Kaern M, Megeney LA: A non-death role of the yeast metacaspase: Yca1p alters cell cycle dynamics. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e2956-10.1371/journal.pone.0002956.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Enoksson M, Salvesen GS: Metacaspases are not caspases-always doubt. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17: 1221-10.1038/cdd.2010.45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vercammen D, Declercq W, Vandenabeele P, Van Breusegem F: Are metacaspases caspases?. J Cell Biol. 2007, 179: 375-380. 10.1083/jcb.200705193.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carmona-Gutierrez D, Fröhlich KU, Kroemer G, Madeo F: Metacaspases are caspases. Doubt no more. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17: 377-8. 10.1038/cdd.2009.198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rawlings ND: Peptidase inhibitors in the MEROPS database. Biochimie. 2010, 92: 1463-83. 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.04.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Atkinson HJ, Babbitt PC, Sajid M: The global cysteine peptidase landscape in parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25: 573-581. 10.1016/j.pt.2009.09.006.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mottram JC, Helms MJ, Coombs GH, Sajid M: Clan CD cysteine peptidases of parasitic protozoa. Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19: 182-187. 10.1016/S1471-4922(03)00038-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coll NS, Vercammen D, Smidler A, Clover C, Van Breusegem F, Dangl JL, Epple P: Arabidopsis type I metacaspases control cell death. Science. 2010, 330: 1393-7. 10.1126/science.1194980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Belenghi B, Romero-Puertas MC, Vercammen D, Brackenier A, Inzé D, Delledonne M, Van Breusegem F: Metacaspase activity of Arabidopsis thaliana is regulated by S-nitrosylation of a critical cysteine residue. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 1352-1358. 10.1074/jbc.M608931200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sundström JF, Vaculova A, Smertenko AP, Savenkov EI, Golovko A, Minina E, Tiwari BS, Rodriguez-Nieto S, Zamyatnin AA, Välineva T, Saarikettu J, Frilander MJ, Suarez MF, Zavialov A, Ståhl U, Hussey PJ, Silvennoinen O, Sundberg E, Zhivotovsky B, Bozhkov PV: Tudor staphylococcal nuclease is an evolutionarily conserved component of the programmed cell death degradome. Nat Cell Biol. 2009, 11: 1347-54. 10.1038/ncb1979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hastings I: How artemisinin-containing combination therapies slow the spread of antimalarial drug resistance. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27: 67-72. 10.1016/j.pt.2010.09.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Picot S, Burnod J, Bracchi V, Chumpitazi BF, Ambroise-Thomas P: Apoptosis related to chloroquine sensitivity of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 91: 590-591. 10.1016/S0035-9203(97)90039-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Olayan EM, Williams GT, Hurd H: Apoptosis in the malaria protozoan, Plasmodium berghei: a possible mechanism for limiting intensity of infection in the mosquito. Int J Parasitol. 2002, 32: 1133-1143. 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00087-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Y, Wang X, Liu X, Wang Y: Data-mining approaches reveal hidden families of proteases in the genome of malaria parasite. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 601-616. 10.1101/gr.913403.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenthal PJ: Cysteine proteases of malaria parasites. Int J Parasitol. 2004, 34: 1489-1499. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.10.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meslin B, Barnadas C, Boni V, Latour C, De Monbrison F, Kaiser K, Picot S: Features of apoptosis in Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stage through a putative role of PfMCA1 metacaspase-like protein. J Infect Dis. 2007, 195: 1852-1859. 10.1086/518253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Le Chat L, Sinden RE, Dessens JT: The role of metacaspase 1 in Plasmodium berghei development and apoptosis. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007, 153: 41-47. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.01.016.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ali M, Al-Olayan EM, Lewis S, Matthews H, Hurd H: Naturally occurring triggers that induce apoptosis-like programmed cell death in Plasmodium berghei ookinetes. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e12634-10.1371/journal.pone.0012634.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mutai BK, Waitumbi JN: Apoptosis stalks Plasmodium falciparum maintained in continuous culture condition. Malaria J. 2010, 9 (Suppl 3): S6-10.1186/1475-2875-9-S3-S6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hossain MJ, Korde R, Singh S, Mohmmed A, Dasaradhi PV, Chauhan VS, Malhotra P: Tudor domain proteins in protozoan parasites and characterization of Plasmodium falciparum tudor staphylococcal nuclease. Int J Parasitol. 2008, 38: 513-26. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.09.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hossain MJ, Korde R, Singh PK, Kanodia S, Ranjan R, Ram G, Kalsey GS, Singh R, Malhotra P: Plasmodium falciparum Tudor Staphylococcal Nuclease interacting proteins suggest its role in nuclear as well as splicing processes. Gene. 2010, 468: 48-57. 10.1016/j.gene.2010.08.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lescure FX, Le Loup G, Freilij H, Develoux M, Paris L, Brutus L, Pialoux G: Chagas disease: changes in knowledge and management. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 556-70. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70098-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Den Boer ML, Alvar J, Davidson RN, Ritmeijer K, Balasegaram M: Developments in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2009, 14: 395-410. 10.1517/14728210903153862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Helms MJ, Ambit A, Appleton P, Tetley L, Coombs GH, Mottram JC: Bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei depend upon multiple metacaspases associated with RAB11-positive endosomes. J Cell Sci. 2006, 119: 1105-1117. 10.1242/jcs.02809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Szallies A, Kubata BK, Duszenko M: A metacaspase of Trypanosoma brucei causes loss of respiration competence and clonal death in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 2002, 517: 144-150. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02608-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moss CX, Westrop GD, Juliano L, Coombs GH, Mottram JC: Metacaspase 2 of Trypanosoma brucei is a calcium-dependent cysteine peptidase active without processing. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581: 5635-5639. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Watanabe N, Lam E: Two Arabidopsis metacaspases AtMCP1b and AtMCP2b are arginine/lysine-specific cysteine proteases and activate apoptosis-like cell death in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 14691-14699. 10.1074/jbc.M413527200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kosec G, Alvarez VE, Agüero F, Sánchez D, Dolinar M, Turk B, Turk V, Cazzulo JJ: Metacaspases of Trypanosoma cruzi: possible candidates for programmed cell death mediators. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006, 145: 18-28. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. González IJ, Desponds C, Schaff C, Mottram JC, Fasel N: Leishmania major metacaspase can replace yeast metacaspase in programmed cell death and has arginine-specific cysteine peptidase activity. Int J Parasitol. 2007, 37: 161-172. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee N, Gannavaram S, Selvapandiyan A, Debrabant A: Characterization of metacaspases with trypsin-like activity and their putative role in programmed cell death in the protozoan parasite Leishmania. Eukaryot Cell. 2007, 6: 1745-1757. 10.1128/EC.00123-07.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zalila H, González IJ, El-Fadili A, Delgado M, Desponds C, Schaff C, Fasel N: Processing of metacaspase into a cytoplasmic catalytic domain mediating cell death in Leishmania major. Mol Microbiology. 2011, 79: 222-39. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07443.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ambit A, Fasel N, Coombs GH, Mottram JC: An essential role for the Leishmania major metacaspase in cell cycle progression. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15: 113-122. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshida N, Iwata H, Yamada T, Sekino T, Matsuo H, Shirahashi K, Miyahara T, Kiyama S, Takemura H: Improvement of the survival rate after rat massive hepatectomy due to the reduction of apoptosis by caspase inhibitor. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 22: 2015-2021. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04960.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Natori S, Selzner M, Valentino KL, Fritz LC, Srinivasan A, Clavien PA, Gores GJ: Apoptosis of sinusoidal endothelial cells occurs during liver preservation injury by a caspase-dependent mechanism. Transplantation. 1999, 68: 89-96. 10.1097/00007890-199907150-00018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoglen NC, Anselmo DM, Katori M, Kaldas M, Shen XD, Valentino KL, Lassman C, Busuttil RW, Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Farmer DG: A caspase inhibitor, IDN-6556, ameliorates early hepatic injury in an ex vivo rat model of warm and cold ischemia. Liver Transpl. 2007, 13: 361-366. 10.1002/lt.21016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pockros PJ, Schiff ER, Shiffman ML, McHutchison JG, Gish RG, Afdhal NH, Makhviladze M, Huyghe M, Hecht D, Oltersdorf T, Shapiro DA: Oral IDN-6556, an antiapoptotic caspase inhibitor, may lower aminotransferase activity in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007, 46: 324-329. 10.1002/hep.21664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Baskin-Bey ES, Washburn K, Feng S, Oltersdorf T, Shapiro D, Huyghe M, Burgart L, Garrity-Park M, van Vilsteren FG, Oliver LK, Rosen CB, Gores GJ: Clinical Trial of the Pan-Caspase Inhibitor, IDN-6556, in Human Liver Preservation Injury. Am J Transplant. 2007, 7: 218-225. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01595.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Berg M, Van der Veken P, Joossens J, Muthusamy V, Breugelmans M, Moss CX, Rudolf J, Cos P, Coombs GH, Maes L, Haemers A, Mottram JC, Augustyns K: Design and evaluation of Trypanosoma brucei metacaspase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010, 20: 2001-2006. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.01.099.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Allan LA, Clarke PR: Apoptosis and autophagy: Regulation of caspase-9 by phosphorylation. FEBS J. 2009, 276: 6063-6073. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07330.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bienvenu AL, Gonzalez-Rey E, Picot S: Apoptosis induced by parasitic diseases. Parasite Vectors. 2010, 17 (3): 106-10.1186/1756-3305-3-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are members of COST action BM0802 ‘Life and death of protozoan parasites’ and appreciate support from this action.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Lise Bienvenu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meslin, B., Zalila, H., Fasel, N. et al. Are protozoan metacaspases potential parasite killers?. Parasites Vectors 4, 26 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-26

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-26

Keywords