Parasites & Vectors

official impact factor 2.13

Open Access Research

Detection and prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia helvetica in Ixodes ricinus ticks in seven study areas in Sweden

Kristofer Severinsson1, Thomas G Jaenson2, John Pettersson2, Kerstin Falk3 and Kenneth Nilsson4,1,5,6*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Bacteriology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

2 Medical Entomology Unit, Department of Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

3 Department of Virology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Solna, Sweden

4 Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

5 Department of Infectious Diseases, Falu County Hospital, Falun, Sweden

6 Center of Clinical Research, Dalarna, Falun, Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

Parasites & Vectors 2010, 3:66 doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-66

Published: 4 August 2010

Abstract

Background

Tick-borne Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. are considered to be emerging human pathogens, but only limited data are available on their occurrence in Sweden. Two real-time PCR assays followed by nested PCR and sequence analysis were carried out to investigate the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum and spotted fever rickettsiae in ticks from seven areas in Sweden.

Results

In 139 pooled samples, representing a total of 1245 Ixodes ricinus ticks (204 larvae, 963 nymphs, 38 males, 40 females), the overall positive mean infection prevalence was 1.3-15.0% for A. phagocytophilum and 1.5-17.3% for R. helvetica. A. phagocytophilum was only detected in nymphs (1.7-19.4%), whereas R. helvetica was detected in all three tick stages. Support for vertical and transstadial transmission was only obtained for R. helvetica. Both agents showed similar infection rates across study areas, although infection rates were greater in coastal areas.

Conclusions

The results show that both pathogens occurred in all seven locations, indicating that they are prevalent in Sweden and should be considered etiological agents in patients recently bitten by ticks.